Rating or sorting: Terminology matters

نویسندگان

چکیده

In this article, we argue that the term “sorting” (in MCDA), although established within a well-defined community, is unappropriate for linguistic, scientific and pragmatic reasons. We present discuss such reasons suggest use of “rating”, since fitting better both foundational part class methods necessity to improve visibility our community.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Confusing stroke terminology: watershed or borderzone infarction?

Confusing Stroke Terminology: Watershed or Borderzone Infarction? We would like to add further comment to the article by van der Zwan and Hillen1 on the variability of the cerebral arterial territories. There has been much confusion of late regarding the location and terminology used to describe cortical and subcortical infarcts situated between two adjacent vascular territories. These regions ...

متن کامل

On the representation and processing of social information in grounded cognitive systems: why terminology matters

The mechanisms underlying social behavior are indeed complex, yet researchers have made important contributions to our understanding of how people make judgments and behave across various social contexts. In particular, recent years has seen a proliferation of research spotlighting the guiding role of embodied and affective information in social processing. Grounded approaches to cognition offe...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['1057-9214', '1099-1360']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1733